Skip to main content

All Scientist Formula I say SAME so know ME

For formula f=m x a which is From SIR ISAAC NEWTON WHICH means acceleration=force/mass, He Means  I say time=force/mass.

 

For TIME=Force/Mass I say TIME due to if Mass is under the effect of force which-is/IT-COMES with TIME only then Gravity is over-powered as TIME IS THEIR. SO ACCELERATION IS SEEN FOR WIHTOUT TIME MATTERS. AS ACCELERATION MEANS THE OBJECT IS PUSHED ONCE WHICH DUE TO FORCE-TRAVELLING KEEPS accelerates according to amount of force so object is not in CONSTANT-SPEED SO FOR CONSTANT-SPEED IF THE object is at then TIME is to be referred. So any force can’t work other than TIME SAMEWAY anyforce can’t produce constant speed other than TIME is seen for. So Newton’s formula is alone for interSTELLar-travell.

 

TIME IS WITH EVENT SO COULD BE JUST SAME AS EVENT but to remove weight and effect of gravity alone TIME COULD Work OR CAN BE USED. So MY USING-TIME FORMULA force-square x TIME/weight is correct. So that much power in TIME THAT Much momentum is found so MOMENTUM IS FORCE X TIME, AND SO THE OTHER THING I SAY THAT IN SPACE FOR MOMEntum force x time can be alone seen as there is no weight in NOTHING OF space so using-Time is force-square x TIME SO FORCE X MOMENTUM (P=FORCE X TIME) SO ONE MORE force MULTIPLIED BY FORCE OF MOMENTUM AND MULtiplied by TIme is same. So Momentun formula for motion is correctly believed where if we multiply momentum formULA BY FORCE THEN GRAVITY WE CAN OVER COME MEANS HERE FORCE-SQUARE CAN REMOVE the effect of gravity if FORCE-SQUARE IS SEEN with TIME TOO AS TIME IS THE CONductor and SCAle of force or Event or DistaNCE. SO MY FORMULA IS CORRECT AS THAT IS POWER IN TIME THAT IS MOTION MEANS MOMENTUM IS FOUND.

 I AGAIN SAY 

Acceleration means Force Before Event, where as TIME MEANS/IS WITH beginning and END of the Event, means with EVENT TIME IS. Where as for mASS is force/ACCELEraTION HERE acceleration isn’t there SO for TIME means MY TIME WHIch is Force/mass mass isn’t there at same place which is Event whereas Aceeleration removed is means a thing is at halt NOW ALREADY HALT I SAID. AS FORCE/ACCELERATION IS  BEGINNING OF EVENT IS ALSO REMOVED or time too was there if the thing is moving too like accelerating. Or TIME REquired is should be seen for the formula as acceleration too can’t be outside time so Time is the next step if acceleration is their or no their I SAY NO THERE HERE BOTH time and acceleration.

 

So for force/time time is removed from force so mass isn’t removed (from force) so mass isn’t moving whereas foR FORCE/ACCELERATION THE THING IS either not moving IS THOUGHT WRONG or is MOVING DUE TO ACCELERATION IS in PAST there so thing had not reached us I CLAIM OR FROM FORCE/ACCELERATION Or we don’t get Mass Separate From Event I mean, as the thing is accelerating in extra-TIME which is no there or acceleration brought we can’t get mass AS IS OUT OF REACH. So TIME IS force/mass and not force/acceleration.

 

F=m x a means if we push a thing for once alone and it goes ahead but it gets reduces in speed after sometime is so in case of acceleration means there are various speeds and speed is different I mean IF SAME FORCE IS APPLIED ONCE ON AN OBJECT AGAIN NOT seen WITH TIME whereas for force= m x t time is MADE up from steady speed so an object can go with constant speed and no fluctuation of velocities is their WHICH IS WITH F=M X A THEIR. 

EIINSTEIN'S FORMULA

 According to Einstein for formula e=mc-square He states Energy is equivalent to Mass multiplied by speed of light square. I say for Energy and Mass, Energy is one light-like-velocity ahead than Mass so Mass is normally found for all the things at one-light-like-velocity than Energy WHO is at two-light-like-velocity.

 

Now Energy here is functioning is due to one light-like-velocity ahead than mass, it is,  so energy and mass are at different light-like-veloicty, what is different from Einstein I say one-thing.

 

We are (at) one light-like-velocity I mean for each and everything, means mass, if found together on Earth is at same light-like-velocity so ENERGY here is one more light-like-velocity and still doesn’t travell TIME as Energy is from NOTHING and not from TIME. So ENERGY, gives rise to weight, AND weight which is intensity of function of Electrons is due to extra-speed of electrons at two-light-like-velocity means one more light-speed than Mass, weight due to (FUNCTION OF) Energy, we come to know two-thing.

 

Like weight is there due to Energy is not in TIME DUE TO WHICH (ENERGY) IS NOT IN EVENT SO stops event, or is against Event weigth is, here but energy isn’t against Event AND IS AFTER-EVENT so IN some rate-of time ENERGY IS IN Three-thing.

 

So energy is in TIME and WE CAN ONLY get  something (means mass here) equal to Energy, if TIME is included with Mass so Energy is one TIME ahead than Mass’s speed-of-light WE UNDERSTAND ALREADY BUT/so mass needs to multiplied by c-square THAT TOO WE KNOW BUT AFTER EVENT ELECTRONS ARE AT SPEED-OF-LIGHT COMPARING TO MASS WHICH IS AT SPEED-OF-LIGHT BEFORE EVENT, SO ENERGY IS AFTER EVENT AND TO MAKE IT (ENERGY) EQUAL TO SOMETHING TIME IS REQUIRED as I again say ENERGY IS AFTER EVENT TOO THEIR SO WORKS WITH TIME TOO FOURTH-THING.

 

but what is the difference between one light-like-velocity ahead and one-TIME ahead?  As (compared to mass) one more light-like-velocity makes energy but Energy is with Event-AHEAD too and not steady like Mass who is at ONE-LIGHT-LIKE-VELOCITY SO ENERGY IS TWO LIGHT-LIKE-VELOCITY we conclude AND ONE-TIME AHEAD THAN MASS (due to is after event for which refer to fourth-thing) (Note Time-TRAVELL Is with event not before and after event [before event is mass and after event one time ahead is energy] so we who are mass and energy so are with event so Time-travell at two-light-like-velocity or eight-ten time more we can travell time) SO DUE TO THIS TIME-AHEAD ENERGY IS THE FORMULA WILL BE MASS X c(SPEED-OF-LIGHT-SQUARE) X TIME = ENERGY I say as fifth-thing.

 So My Formula is E=M X C-SQUARE X TIME.


SOME corrections I Inform to see Formulas

I say all formulas of all scientists same which can be judged by My Momentum Formulas, as Momentum Formulas who are related to Time and Speed, aren't possible to completely denied by other scientists. So My Momentum-Formulas are filling the gaps in too many other scientists formulas, to prove them more correct.


Acceleration = Velocity x Time is CORRECT. AS increase in Velocity is acceleration so at more speed than normal velocity is acceleration. Acceleration means velocity with TIME AS TIME AND VELOCITY WHEN COMBINE only THEN THE THING IS MORE IN TIME means more using time than COMPARING TO constant speed. Time goes less with more speed so (less time means more quickly we do jobs and such jobs MEANS more faster is/means acceleration) so time and speed combinedly makes acceleration.

 

So I WRITE acceleration means increase in velocity where Time is decreasing percentage-wise and velocity is increasing percentage-wise by same rate of decrease in time. So velocity is acceleration over time here over-time means time-remove is due to velocity not that Time could be removed to reach acceleration as higher-speed means more Using-Time so multiplied by TIME accelerations SHOULD BE.

 

Now if we see Acceleration=Velocity/TIME IT IS FOR ABOVE US LIKE WE ARE QUANTUM TO THAT UNIVERSE SO WHOLE TIME REMOVED THIS HIGH SPEED WE HAVE TO GO I mean which doesn't take TIME anyway INSTEAD OF LESS TIME which BY MY formula means we live in TIME AND NOT what the formula says BY TIME-TRAVELLING. (SO I SAY ACCELERATION = VELOCITY X TIME).

 

Speed = Distance x TIME. Distance multiplied by Time is means calculated measure distance we see separately such distance we talk. So that calculated distance we see with time taken to move in that distance so we get speed. So the formula is correct one-thing. Sameway speed is between distance and TIME, SO TO USE distance if we move (by speed) then time is there or TO USE distance speed we are at SO WE USE DISTANCE and then it can't be without TIME second-thing.

 

So I WRITE speed means covering that much distance by Using-Time its not over-time or removed-time it is with time speed is. As for distance/time if we see there is no-time either after distance is made which is without speed not reachable, as with OR AFTER speed WE MOVED only DISTANCE IS then known or LIKE to form distance too TIME IS NO THERE so distance/time is wrong SO speed=distance x time is correct I say.

 

Now if we see Speed = Distance/time here TO form distance TIME is removed means as distance is in TIME AND IT REQUIRES TIME TO FORM DISTANCE NOW SUCH TIME IS stopped or removed or opposite or against as in this formula time is denominator time if removed there is no distance too where there can be no-speed. So the formula is wrong one-thing. OR ACCELERATION AND DISTANCE IF ARE EQUAL BY THIS TWO FORMULAS (PUT IN EACH OTHER Acceleration=Velocity/TIME AND Speed = Distance/time)  THEN THERE IS NO-TIME REQUIRED SO THEN TIME REMOVED MEANS OBJECT IS AT ALL THE DISTANCE WHICH CAN'T BE CALCULATED means some thing there in all length of earth so something covers the whole earth as per its size. So the formula is wrong second-thing. OR for earth something is in both direction either, east and west, or, north and south,. Some such thing can only be built like a ship in sea. SO THERE IS NO TIME AND DISTANCE IN this formula third-thing. (SO I SAY Speed = Distance x TIME)

 

PEOPLE SAY,

Acceleration =Velocity/Time

AND

Speed =Distance/Time

SO WE PUT Velocity =Acceleration X Time

SO GET Acceleration X Time  = Distance/Time

SO DISTANCE= TIME-SQUARE X ACCELERATION.

SO TIME-SQUARE = Distance/Acceleration. So this is the formula people know.

 

I SAY,

SO Acceleration=SPEED X TIME

WE PUT speed = acceleration/time

So we get acceleration =acceleration/time x TIME.

SO A= acceleration.

OR

Speed=Distance x TIME

WE put speed is acceleration/TIME

So we get acceleration/TIME = DISTANCE X TIME

SO ACCELERATION = DISTANCE X TIME-SQUARE.

(DISTANCE= ACCELERATION/TIME-SQUARE).

SO TIME-SQUARE= Acceleration/Distance. So this is the formula I say.

 

SO Formula I know is correct I mean. SO TIME-SQUARE = Distance/Acceleration is wrong and TIME-SQUARE= Acceleration/Distance is correct. Sameway my formula of TIME too can be used to know Acceleration and Distance Correct. I try to Explain below.

 

 

Like My Formula time=force/mass

Here from force mass is changed or removed so TIME COMES into practice. So this is force/mass not mass/force as if we remove force from mass we reach before creation as our creation is in sequence as mass, force, time so force remove or changed means  force before time we remove one-thing so mass has not formed as there was no force for it (as to form mass too time is also required) so mass/force results in removed time TO FORM THAT THING OR TO MOVE THAT THING second-thing here Event before TIME is removed SO THERE IS NO TIME means one-upon-time third-thing.

 

So Like My formula mass=force/time

Here from force time can be removed so steady mass we-get/comes-in-hand. And in our creation sequence  time is after force working (both ways means quantum way too and our normal-life ways too) so from force time can be removed so we reach back to mass WHICH TIME BEFORE FORCE means opposite-time one-thing. So formula is correct. Now in this formula time/force will not come as mass. As if we remove force from time then in the sequence mass, force, time  we remove force so time doesn't remains IS NOT THE CASE as force before it MEANS, TIME is removed, WE REACH OPPOSITE-TIME OR AGAINST TIME, AS time was removed still force was working is one explanation second-thing. The other explanation time/force will not come as FORCE FORMING US which WE remove so THAT THINGS LOSES ENERGY OR STRENGHT IN IT BECOMES LESS SO THAT THING IS MORE WEIGHTY MEANS NON-MOVABLE third-thing AS FORCE-REMOVED is an event (IF) then weight we get what is Opposite-to-Event MEANS one-upon-mass.

 

So formula SPEED=DISTANCE X TIME

WE PUT TIME=FORCE/MASS AND SPEED= ACCELERATION/TIME

SO ACCELERATION/TIME =DISTANCE X (FORCE/MASS)

NOW PUT FORCE = MASS X TIME AND

SO ACCELERATION/TIME =DISTANCE X (MASS X TIME /MASS)

SO DISTANCE= ACCELERATION/TIME X MASS / (MASS X TIME)

SO AGAIN GET DISTANCE = ACCELERATION/TIME-SQUARE or acceleration=distance  x time-square IS THE FORMULA WHICH MEANS IF FROM ACCELERATION WE REACH NO POSSIBILITY OF TIME THEN DISTANCE MEANS PART OF LAND IS FOUND.

OR

ACCELERATION/TIME =DISTANCE X (MASS X TIME /MASS)

ACCELERATION = DISTANCE X TIME-SQUARE. THIS FORMULA MEANS WITH SPEED THERE IS DISTANCE COVERED WE UNDERSTAND BUT IF TIME-SQUARE SPEED WE REACH THEN THE OBJECT IS IN NORMAL-ACCELERATION.


Feel Well To Ask. If I am not told what do others think I can't explain. I Should Know what is Thought by PEOPLE on My Formulas, then we can discuss, so e-mail me then I can answer you, by knowing your questions. SO ANYTHING SEARCH-ENGINE PEOPLE TOO ASK I will take as favour, to answer.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

About SPACE-SHIP I say

  A Space-Ship can stay in Nothing which is high-up. It doesn’t requires fuel for it. Due to in Nothing, there is Time no required so it is already gaining-Time in Nothing means Time in Nothing is at light-like-velocity so space-ship without travelling at high speed too can stay high in Nothing, as Nothing is its base. Force-Travelling of space is there on the Space-Ship but Force-Travelling is three events/light-like-velocity ahead so we can travel three times speed of light but not more as ahead is Nothing. So below three light-like-velocity we can travel if travel faster than light. But there is no Force-Travelling we can experience of Space. Due to Nothing is if there is atleast light-like-velocity so like a Space-Ship can stand in Space same way can also travel at light-liike-velocity. Now My formula I WRITE: IT IS FORCE-TRAVELLING-SQUARE. Due to this formula we can travel at the speed of light. So Force-Travelling-Cube is two light-like-velocity ahead and one more lig...

Concerning LIFE: Islaam Article

  Islaam is as it was 1400 years ago. You shoudn’t be as compassionate but more caring. You should be more kind than loving. You should not be jealous of anybody should eye or envision reasonable deeds for others or your selves. If you think of Allaah’s believer you relate yourselves to Allaah as Allaah is with Allaah’s believer, that is what you accept through belief ( co-operation ) and due to Allaah’s ordained co-operation or what is good deed at least and at last if Universally is sure through which you have Allaah’s mercy ( Where ) means if you have no dispute as a believer. Feel yourselves under norms that is to become kind and generous. Keep right attitude that is to think good, deal justly, own till right, not harm anybody. To be righteous and do good deeds is the norm ( to live life ). The things which are not norms of our-life are spoiling yourselves, spoiling jobs of others, stealing, gambling and all. Having an eye or paying attention to a Muslim girl brings insensibili...

ON Artificial INTELLIGENCE

  ON ARTIFICIAL Intelligence This paragraphs are number 2. Think and do: sit, stand, don't harm-no unwanted action with people, grab and pick only by listening commands. Think and govern: to not harm think and handle: handle with care. Think and tackle: talk with people. This paragraphs are number 3. Rules: to not rape and is to not steal anybody's belonging and there are no-lies lies we don't keep. Reason: to get accustomed and accomodated with people like talk, reply. To speak is the reason. Purpose: to get our job done that is talk too and join the commands for new work possible, like reason rules policy. It means so/or Logic and psychology they shouldn't be changing. Policy: to work by justice, balance to be justice or know Nothing and Reality. This paragraph is number 4. Commands: to keep promise and do justice and be loyal is Nothing and Reality. Logic: only possible jobs are there like steal, rape, grab, punch, speak lies all such no possible psychology: as we do...